<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Zachary Williamson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zacharykwilliamson.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zacharykwilliamson.com</link>
	<description>SEO Outsourcing Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:54:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Expert Keyword Research (2012 Revisited) by How to Write Panda-Friendly Articles - Zachary Williamson : Zachary Williamson</title>
		<link>http://zacharykwilliamson.com/keyword-research/#comment-2195</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Write Panda-Friendly Articles - Zachary Williamson : Zachary Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharykwilliamson.com/?p=2626#comment-2195</guid>
		<description>[...] 2% keyword density is too much in the Post-Panda era as a 1000 word article would have to mention the keyword at least 20 times and this totally looks spammy. Instead, use keyword synonyms or semantically related keywords because Google now loves synonyms. An example could be replica watches, imitation watches, counterfeit watches or fake Rolexes. Using this strategy you can really get your keyword density up to 3% or even 4% without raising red flags with Google&#8217;s webspam team. I also suggest reading my more in-depth article titled, Kewyord Research Expert. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2% keyword density is too much in the Post-Panda era as a 1000 word article would have to mention the keyword at least 20 times and this totally looks spammy. Instead, use keyword synonyms or semantically related keywords because Google now loves synonyms. An example could be replica watches, imitation watches, counterfeit watches or fake Rolexes. Using this strategy you can really get your keyword density up to 3% or even 4% without raising red flags with Google&#8217;s webspam team. I also suggest reading my more in-depth article titled, Kewyord Research Expert. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Post Panda SEO Tips by How to Write Panda-Friendly Articles - Zachary Williamson : Zachary Williamson</title>
		<link>http://zacharykwilliamson.com/post-panda-seo-tips/#comment-2194</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Write Panda-Friendly Articles - Zachary Williamson : Zachary Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharykwilliamson.com/?p=2358#comment-2194</guid>
		<description>[...] comply. This is why changing up your article writing style may be one of the most valuable Post-Panda SEO tips I have to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comply. This is why changing up your article writing style may be one of the most valuable Post-Panda SEO tips I have to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Post Panda SEO Tips by Expert Keyword Research (2012 Revisited) - Zachary Williamson : Zachary Williamson</title>
		<link>http://zacharykwilliamson.com/post-panda-seo-tips/#comment-2193</link>
		<dc:creator>Expert Keyword Research (2012 Revisited) - Zachary Williamson : Zachary Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharykwilliamson.com/?p=2358#comment-2193</guid>
		<description>[...] was the suggested practice for keyword placement within your text however, is now too much in the Post-Panda SEO era as it disrupts the natural flow of writing and tends to look spammy. Instead, use keyword [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was the suggested practice for keyword placement within your text however, is now too much in the Post-Panda SEO era as it disrupts the natural flow of writing and tends to look spammy. Instead, use keyword [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best SEO Software, Tools &amp; Services by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://zacharykwilliamson.com/the-best-seo-software-tools-services/#comment-2192</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharykwilliamson.com/?p=2324#comment-2192</guid>
		<description>Thanx for finding the typo... My sexual orientation happens to be straight though.  Do always post such flattering remarks on people&#039;s blogs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx for finding the typo&#8230; My sexual orientation happens to be straight though.  Do always post such flattering remarks on people&#8217;s blogs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best SEO Software, Tools &amp; Services by Sensistar</title>
		<link>http://zacharykwilliamson.com/the-best-seo-software-tools-services/#comment-2191</link>
		<dc:creator>Sensistar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharykwilliamson.com/?p=2324#comment-2191</guid>
		<description>Hey faggot spell Einstein right on your site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey faggot spell Einstein right on your site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Philippines SEO Consultant by Will Google Censor Adult Search Engines? : Mobile Live Chat</title>
		<link>http://zacharykwilliamson.com/philippines-seo-consultant/#comment-2190</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Google Censor Adult Search Engines? : Mobile Live Chat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharykwilliamson.com/?p=2128#comment-2190</guid>
		<description>[...] adult industry now in the huge population of the net is the most competitive when SEO is concern. In many top-keywords-queried statistics we can see from top 3 spots are censored.They [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] adult industry now in the huge population of the net is the most competitive when SEO is concern. In many top-keywords-queried statistics we can see from top 3 spots are censored.They [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Plus + Pages for Brands and Business by Guest</title>
		<link>http://zacharykwilliamson.com/seo-google-plus-for-business/#comment-2189</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharykwilliamson.com/?p=2224#comment-2189</guid>
		<description>If you think about this logically from a business standpoint, take 2 businesses that are exactly the same that compete against each other.  Make them apples to apples.  One utilizes Google+ and another does not.  I would bet my last dollar that Google ranks the business higher that incorporates Google+; they would be fools not to.  I am sure that Google has included a variable within their algorithm that would boost rankings for businesses who utilize Google+, co.  Quite frankly, nothing is for free in this world and the value that Google assigns to this (while it is free), their value add internally is market share and reach (to name a few) which further strengthens their brand and advertising platform.  
 
In fact, I am going to run a test.  I have 2 client sites now that I built on the same platform, with brand new websites.  One of them has a URL tenure of 2 years, the other is about 6 months old.  I am going to test google+ against both- I am going to add one to google+ to the newer site and leave the other alone (they have not paid me anyway, so it’s fully justified).  Let’s see who performs better…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think about this logically from a business standpoint, take 2 businesses that are exactly the same that compete against each other.  Make them apples to apples.  One utilizes Google+ and another does not.  I would bet my last dollar that Google ranks the business higher that incorporates Google+; they would be fools not to.  I am sure that Google has included a variable within their algorithm that would boost rankings for businesses who utilize Google+, co.  Quite frankly, nothing is for free in this world and the value that Google assigns to this (while it is free), their value add internally is market share and reach (to name a few) which further strengthens their brand and advertising platform. <br />
 <br />
In fact, I am going to run a test.  I have 2 client sites now that I built on the same platform, with brand new websites.  One of them has a URL tenure of 2 years, the other is about 6 months old.  I am going to test google+ against both- I am going to add one to google+ to the newer site and leave the other alone (they have not paid me anyway, so it’s fully justified).  Let’s see who performs better…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best SEO Software, Tools &amp; Services by BootyTube247</title>
		<link>http://zacharykwilliamson.com/the-best-seo-software-tools-services/#comment-2187</link>
		<dc:creator>BootyTube247</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharykwilliamson.com/?p=2324#comment-2187</guid>
		<description>GREAT articles Thanks for  your efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREAT articles Thanks for  your efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Expert Keyword Research (2012 Revisited) by Keyword Keeyword</title>
		<link>http://zacharykwilliamson.com/keyword-research/#comment-2186</link>
		<dc:creator>Keyword Keeyword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharykwilliamson.com/?p=2626#comment-2186</guid>
		<description>Nice article Zachary

I like you methode</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article Zachary</p>
<p>I like you methode</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Post Panda Article Marketing Tips by Writing a Panda-Friendly Article - Zachary Williamson : Zachary Williamson</title>
		<link>http://zacharykwilliamson.com/post-panda-article-marketing-tips/#comment-2184</link>
		<dc:creator>Writing a Panda-Friendly Article - Zachary Williamson : Zachary Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharykwilliamson.com/?p=2451#comment-2184</guid>
		<description>[...] This sounds crazy right?!? Why in the world would you want to give away links and loose your link juice? I can and will write a full article about this post Panda tip but in this article, I will just summarize. Google likes to crawl as much as possible and if you can provide a relevant link to a helpful resource and the user clicks-through and sticks, then Google will reward you for it. The rules are simple, do not link to any page or site that competes for the same type of traffic. Link only to high authority sites like .edu, .gov or any high PR site. For an example just look at my outbound links here or in this Post-panda Article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This sounds crazy right?!? Why in the world would you want to give away links and loose your link juice? I can and will write a full article about this post Panda tip but in this article, I will just summarize. Google likes to crawl as much as possible and if you can provide a relevant link to a helpful resource and the user clicks-through and sticks, then Google will reward you for it. The rules are simple, do not link to any page or site that competes for the same type of traffic. Link only to high authority sites like .edu, .gov or any high PR site. For an example just look at my outbound links here or in this Post-panda Article. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

